@hernansedano I really love that you are emphasizing having a careful look at the problem that is to be solved! That is a critical understanding that we sometimes (or more often) forget. I think there is maybe another or an “umbrella” driver for the circle, which maybe could be “Instance Managers tend to spend all day focusing on their instance, and the global team only has limited visibility into what they can do to help instances be successful” and the converse, “Instance Managers do not have a structured way to provide the global team with guidance that the global team needs to be successful”. Maybe this results in the conclusion that “we need a process for Instance Managers to advise on decisions that impact global resources” - this covers not only what information is needed by the global team (product design and delivery, funding models, culture and priorities) but also what information or support is needed from the global team. So the drivers you mentioned are definitely a perfect chance for proposals that are created by the consent process, and the reason for the circle is so there will be a place and process for those proposals/decisions to be made. Up to now we are so lucky to have amazing double-duty superstars like @Rachel and @lin_d_hop and @tschumilas and @Jen and others who know where many of the pain points are because they are or have been instance managers as well as working at the product level. Maybe the Instance Managers circle can systematize the work that informs both running an instance and developing a product/organization in a way that makes sure many voices are heard, work is shared, and the organization is more sustainable?